Below is the transcript of Zizeks introductory statement. Chopin Nocturne No. 2 Piano Mono - moshimo sound design. Last week, Peterson announced that he and Zizek would be meeting on stage at the Sony Centre in Toronto for a debate called "Happiness: Capitalism v. Marxism." Apparently the two men are. 25 Debate quotes that show Jordan Peterson doesn't know what - Medium Todays China combines these two features in its extreme form strong, totalitarian state, state-wide capitalist dynamics. Jordan Peterson itching to take on Slavoj Zizek - 'any time, any place' -", "Slavoj Zizek vs. Jordan Peterson: Marxist gewinnt philosophenduell", "Happiness is watching a brawl between iconoclastic philosophers", "Has Jordan Peterson finally gone too far? Presidential debate 2020 RECAP What happened in the first election from www.the-sun.com. Thats the big of ideologies how to make good, decent people do horrible things. live commentary is quite funny. And we should act in a large scale, collective way. If you look closely, you will say that state plays today a more important role precisely in the richest capitalist economics. [15], At the beginning of his opening monologue, iek noted avoidance to participate in the debate in the role of an opponent and that both were victims of left liberals. Although even the Dalai Lama justifies Tibetan Buddhism in Western terms in the full suite of happiness and the avoidance of pain, happiness as a goal of our life is a very problematic notion. [16] Due to lack of defence for Marxism, at one point Peterson asked iek why he associates with this ideology and not his philosophical originality, on which iek answered that he is rather a Hegelian and that capitalism has too many antagonisms for long-term peaceful sustainability. Peterson has risen to fame on the basis of his refusal to pay the usual fealties to political correctness. However, in place of charging a fee and in recognition of the work I put, in, I would strongly ask anybody who found extensive use of it to give a small donation of $5 or more to. ) We're in for quite a night a quick word about format. Postmodernism: History and Diagnosis Transcript Dr. Jordan Peterson 2019-05-17T08:28:01-04:00. It is often claimed that true or not that religion makes some otherwise bad people do good things. Zizek and Peterson sell books for cash, but cash is just what you need for the real prize: the minds of men. opinions), and that the debate was cordial, even mutually admirative at times. Slavoj iek on His Stubborn Attachment to Communism (Ep. 84 - BONUS) (Chinas success makes a joke out of the whole premise of the debate: the old-fashioned distinction between communism and capitalism.) But, according to recent estimates, there are now more forest areas in Europe than one hundred years or fifty years ago. MICHAEL FEDOROVSKY 1* 1* Investigador Independiente y ensayista. Bonus: Zizek on the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Zizek on the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. From the Zizek-Peterson debate. #philosophytiktok #philosophy #slavojz His comments on one of the greatest feats of human rhetoric were full of expressions like You have to give the devil his due and This is a weird one and Almost all ideas are wrong. Below is the transcript of zizek's introductory statement. They dont mention communism to legitimise their rule, they prefer the old Confucian notion of a harmonious society. T. S. Eliot, the great conservative, wrote, quote what happens when a new work of art is created is something that happens simultaneously to all the work of art which preceded it. Which Way, Raskolnikov? iek v. Peterson - The California Review Neither can face the reality or the future. Posted on August 20, 2021 by David Roman. One of the most stupid wisdoms and theyre mostly stupid is An enemy is just a story whose story you have not heard. iek & Peterson Debate - Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism (transcript Petersons opening remarks were disappointing even for his fans in the audience. Most of the attacks on me are from left-liberals, he began, hoping that they would be turning in their graves even if they were still alive. They were a vague and not particularly informed (by his own admission) reading of The Communist Manifesto. April 20, 2019. El debate Peterson-iek, oficialmente titulado Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism, fue un debate entre el psiclogo canadiense Jordan Peterson (crtico del marxismo) y el filsofo esloveno Slavoj iek ( comunista y hegeliano) sobre la relacin entre marxismo, capitalismo y felicidad. The Fool and the Madman - Jacobin This is again not a moral reproach. The title of the debate was "Happiness: Capitalism v. Marxism." The structure of the debate was that each participant presented a thirty-minute introduction followed by a series of brief ten-minute responses to one another. And if you think I have included my method and aims in a Note at the end of the transcript. Once traditional authority loses its substantial power, it is not possible to return to it. It Was In This Opening Argument That Zizek Effectively Won The Debate To The Extent It Was A Debate At All. The great surprise of this debate turned out to be how much in common the old-school Marxist and the Canadian identity politics refusenik had. Journal articles: 'Marxism in politics, economy and philosophy Peterson and Zizek Debate Transcription : r/zizek - reddit For example, an example not from neo-conservatives. So, I dont accept any cheap optimism. causes (from Donald Trump to migrants). Then once you factor in the notion that much of Marxism is . They seemed to believe that the academic left, whoever that might be, was some all-powerful cultural force rather than the impotent shrinking collection of irrelevances it is. Burgis, Ben; Hamilton, Conrad Bongard; McManus, Matthew; Trejo, Marion (2020). We are spontaneously really free. In our human universe, power, in the sense of exerting authority, is something much more mysterious, even irrational. back to this pre-modern state of affairs. Fearing establishment, Sanders' leftist critics offer socialism, without socialism authors with occasional bridges being thrown accross. In this sense of playing with traditional values of mixing references to them with open obscenities, Trump is the ultimate post-modern president. This is why egalitarianism itself should never be accepted at its face value. Debate Peterson-iek - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre Error message: "The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your. Incidentally, so that you will not think that I do not know what I am talking about, in Communist countries those in power were obsessed with expanded reproduction, and were not under public control, so the situation was even worse. with its constellation of thinkers. And, incidentally Im far from believing in ordinary peoples wisdom. essentially well-placed, but as many are quick to point out, meaningful cause beyond the mere struggle for pleasurable survival. [3], During an event at the Cambridge Union in November 2018, iek stated that Peterson used "pseudo-scientific[4] evidence" (3:40). Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. Believers call him God the Father. But can God be called a man? Slavoj iek - RationalWiki Slavoj iek - Wikizero.com The very premise of tonight's event is that we all participate in the life of, thought. Learn how your comment data is processed. The strange bronze artifact perplexed scholars for more than a century, including how it traveled so far from home. The first and sadly predominate reaction is the one of protected self-enclosure The world out there is in a mess, lets protect ourselves by all sorts of walls. your opponent's ideas. The two generally agreed on. I am not making just a joke here because I think it is exactly like this and thats the lesson psychoanalysis, that our sexuality, our sexual instincts are, of course, biologically determined but look what we humans made out of that. Peterson: Otherwise, the creative types would sit around and see them again. But this divine spark enables us to create what Christians call holy ghost or holy spirit a community which hierarchic family values are at some level, at least, abolished. Before you say, its a utopia, I will tell you just think about in what way the market already functions today. This Was An Interesting Debate. His That the debate will be live-streamed and more than 1,400 people have already dropped $14.95 for. So, let me begin by bringing together the three notions from the title Happiness, Communism, Capitalism in one exemplary case China today. Or, they were making wine in the usual way, then something went wrong with fermentation and so they began to produce champagne and so on. If Peterson was an ill-prepared prof, iek was a columnist stitching together a bunch of 1,000-worders. The debate itself was framed as a free-spirited competition, "Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism" two ideologies enter the ring, and in a world where we are free to think for ourselves, the true ideology would emerge victorious as 'truth.' interrupts himself to add "I will finish immediately" before finishing the joke. [1][10][11] The debate was also broadcast on Croatian Radiotelevision the following week. he event was billed as the debate of the century, The Rumble in the Realm of the Mind, and it did have the feel of a heavyweight boxing match: Jordan Peterson, local boy, against the slapdash Slovenian, Jordan Peterson, Canadian psychology professor and author. One hated communism. The Church of England is debating if believers should stop using gendered language when talking about God. Zizek was hard to follow in his prepared statement, he becomes "[23], In commenting directly on how the debate was received, iek wrote: "It is typical that many comments on the debate pointed out how Petersons and my position are really not so distinct, which is literally true in the sense that, from their standpoint, they cannot see the difference between the two of us: I am as suspicious as Peterson. ", "Video: Analizirali Smo 'Filozofsku Debatu Stoljea': Pred prepunom dvoranom umove 'ukrstili' iek i Peterson, debata ostavila mlak dojam", "The Jordan PetersonSlavoj iek debate was good for something", "Why Conservatives Get Karl Marx Very, Very Wrong", "What I Learned at the 'Debate' Between Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek", "How Zizek Should Have Replied to Jordan Peterson", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Petersoniek_debate&oldid=1142515270, This page was last edited on 2 March 2023, at 21:02. Below is the transcript of Zizek's introductory statement. She observed in a recent critical note that in the years since the movement began it deployed an unwavering obsession with the perpetrators. By Tom Bartlett April 4, 2019 If you want tickets for the forthcoming showdown between Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek, which will be held later this month in Toronto, better act fast: There. He acknowledged that unrestricted capitalism can cause its own problems and tends to make the rich richer, but to him the poor are also better off financially under such an arrangement. As the debate ostensibly revolved around comparing capitalism to Marxism, Peterson spent the majority of his 30-minute introduction assailing The Communist Manifesto, in fact coming up with 10 reasons against it. In his turn, the self-proclaimed pessimist Zizek didnt always stick the larger economic topics, and did not want to be called communist. I mean primarily so called popularly neural-link, the direct link between our brain and digital machines, and then brains among themselves. it's made of many idea nuggets only tenuously linked to one other although I cannot but notice the irony of how Peterson and I, the participants in this duel of the century, are both marginalised by the official academic community. Who could? Cookie Notice So, I agree that human life of freedom and dignity does not They are both highly attuned to ideology and the mechanisms of power, and yet they are not principally political thinkers. Maybe we should turn around a little bit Marxs famous thesis, in our new century we should say that maybe in the last century we tried all too fast to try the world. In such times of urgency, when we know we have to act but dont know how to act, thinking is needed. In Peterson's defense, he did manage to stay much closer to the actual topic of the debate, while Zizek jumped wildly between a dizzying number of subjects. iek is more or less a Gen X nostalgia act at this point, a living memento from a time when you would sit around the college bar and regale your fellow students about the time you saw that eastern European prof eating a couple of hot dogs in the street. Zizek vs Peterson: A Muslim Perspective - Berkeley Institute for What happened to Peterson after his debate with Zizek? - Quora But these two towering figures of different disciplines and domains share more than a. commitment to thinking itself. Im far from a simple social constructionism here. agreement (as well they should, adopting neither deluded far-left or far-right No. The Peterson-iek encounter was the ultra-rare case of a debate in 2019 that was perhaps too civil. On Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson: Nature, Culture, and the Displacement of Time. It has been said of the debate that "nothing is a greater waste of time." Tickets to the livestream are $14.95, and admission to the venue itself was running as high as $1,500. Peterson opens with a 30-minutes speech where he criticizes the communist In our daily lives, we pretend to desire things which we do not really desire, so that ultimately the worst thing that can happen is to get what we officially desire. Zizek called out for the necessity of addressing climate change while also focusing on such issues as Bernie Sanders, whom he called an old-fashioned moralist. Zizek sees Sanders as being unfairly portrayed as a radical. The people who laugh might do it that way, he replied. Opinion | Here's how Slavoj Zizek should prepare for 'debate of the So, I agree that human life of freedom and dignity does not consist just in searching for happiness, no matter how much we spiritualise it, or in the effort to actualise our inner potentials. But there was one truly fascinating moment in the evening. Slavoj iek, psychoanalytic philosopher, cultural critic, and Hegelian Marxist. His remarks were just as rambling as Petersons, veering from Trump and Sanders to Dostoevsky to the refugee crisis to the aesthetics of Nazism. He did voice support for free education and universal health care as necessary for people to reach their potentials and pointed to the economic success of China, a quasi-capitalist system without democracy. I hope reading the debate will help me understand the arguments better. Are you also ready to affirm that Hitler was our enemy because his story was not heard? yardstick: In our daily lives, we pretend to desire things which we do not really desire, Far from pushing us too far, the Left is gradually losing its ground already for decades. And that was basically it. Equality can also mean and thats the equality I advocate creating the space for as many as possible individuals to develop their different potentials. [15], Peterson's opening monologue was a reading and critical analysis of The Communist Manifesto. While the two take different political stances, both have been known to rail against political correctness and found that issue in common. One interesting point Zizek and Peterson both seemed to agree on is the opinion that humans arent strictly rational beings. Hegels motto Evil resides in the gaze which sees evil everywhere fully applies here. Studebaker concludes that "Peterson didn't prepare. Zizek is particularly culpable here, for Regarding how the debate was receiving, judging from Twitter and some quick Zizek will suit up for Team M and Peterson will wear the "C" on his hometown jersey. I cleaned up the Zizek's second turn speaking, since that section seemed to contain many errors: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qs7mNIUsYt9kWcdO785ec_dEWmEHLo92yTso0CVtxNk/edit?usp=sharing. You can find a transcript of it here. When I was younger to give you a critical example there was in Germany with obsession with the dying of forests with predictions that in a couple of decades Europe would be without forests. 76.3K ,809 . TikTok Zizek is my dad (@zizekcumsock): "From the Zizek-Peterson debate. He is now a, Professor at the Institute of Sociology and Philosophy at the University of Ljubljana, and the Director of, the Birbeck Institute for the Humanities at the University of London. Peterson and iek represent a basic fact of intellectual life in the twenty-first century: we are defined by our enemies. [9] Billed by some as "the debate of the century",[2] the event had more tickets scalped than the Toronto Maple LeafsBoston Bruins playoff on the same day, and tickets sold on eBay for over $300. Iran is a land of contradictions where oppression and freedom uneasily coexist. There was an opportunity. "[1][6] According to Matthew Sharpe writing for The Conversation, .mw-parser-output .templatequote{overflow:hidden;margin:1em 0;padding:0 40px}.mw-parser-output .templatequote .templatequotecite{line-height:1.5em;text-align:left;padding-left:1.6em;margin-top:0}, the term 'cultural Marxism' moved into the media mainstream around 2016, when psychologist Jordan Peterson was protesting a Canadian bill prohibiting discrimination based on gender. It was full of the stench of burning strawmen. Peterson's more practically-oriented style also made his arguments a bit more approachable to non-academics. The mere dumb presence of the celebrities on the stage mattered vastly more than anything they said, naturally. Press J to jump to the feed. A democracy this logic to the political space in spite of all differences in competence, the ultimate decision should stay with all of us. The very liberal gaze with demonizes Trump is also evil because it ignores how its own failures opened up the space for Trumps type of patriotic populism. Peterson had trapped himself into a zero-sum game, Zizek had opened up a. Everything was permitted to them as they perceived themselves as direct instrument of their divinity of historical necessity, as progress towards communism. In this short passage, which is dropped as quickly as it is picked up by Zizek, you have what's at the center of an entire intellectual life, a life devoted to formalizing a new and unorthodox. Here is the original video extracted from https://www.jordanvsslavojdebate.com (livestream.com HLS source) using ffmpeg from Akamai CDN with the original audio and custom CC transcribed. I think a simple overview of the situation points in the opposite direction. Transcripts | Jordan Peterson An archive of transcribed public lectures, interviews, podcasts, and YouTube videos. Orthodoxy, by G. K. Chesterton. Peterson blamed cultural Marxism for phenomena like the movement to respect gender-neutral pronouns which, in his view, undermines freedom of speech. He makes a big deal out of how he obsessed about It seems that our countries are run relatively well, but is the mess the so-called rogue countries find themselves in not connected to how we interact with them? Peterson and Zizek Debate - transcribed by John Li - johnmhli@berkeley.edu - 916 623 5512 - https://chicago.academia.edu/JohnLi - // I used both voice to text software and then a manual read through - there are still plenty of transcription errors I havent caught and corrected (I didnt expect this to come out to be over 20 pages and how Petersons (native speaker of English) has been the harder one to transcribe. They didnt understand what is happening to them with military defeat, economic crisis, what they perceived as moral decay, and so on. Die Analyse dieser Figur findet mit starkem Bezug zur Etablierung I cannot but notice the irony of how Peterson and I, the participants in this duel of the century, are both marginalised by the official academic community. Its not just that in spite of all our natural and cultural differences the same divine sparks dwells in everyone. The twentieth century left was defined by its opposition to the truth fundamental tendencies of modernity: the reign of capital with its aggressive market competition, the authoritarian bureaucratic state power. Another summary of the Peterson/iek debate. Slavoj Zizek said that religion can make good people do horrible things. Jordan Peterson vs Slavoj Zizek was more a performance than a debate Next point one should stop blaming hedonist egotism for our woes. Happiness is a confused notion, basically it relies on the subjects inability or unreadiness to fully confront the consequences of his / her / their desire. Good evening and welcome to the Sony Center for Performing Arts. attacking the manifesto isn't perhaps attacking Communism or even Marxism as its The two professors had both argued before against happiness as something a person should pursue. His charge against Peterson's argument is followed with how he thinks Zizek Moderated by Stephen J. Blackwood, it was held before an audience of 3,000 at Meridian Hall in Toronto on 19 April 2019. It's hard not to crack up when out of time for Let me now briefly deal with in a friendly way I claim with what became known sorry for the irony as the lobster topic. [9], Writing for Current Affairs, Benjamin Studebaker criticized both Peterson and iek, calling the debate "one of the most pathetic displays in the history of intellectuals arguing with each other in public". Competencies for what? We often need a master figure to push us out an inertia and, Im not afraid to say, that forces us to be free. Forced marriages and homophobia is ok, just as long as they are limited to another country which is otherwise fully included in the world market. Freedom and responsibility hurt they require an effort, and the highest function of an authentic master is to literally to awake in us to our freedom. Peterson was humiliated deeply in it, having to admit he'd never read any Marx despite demonizing him for years, and only having skimmed one of Marx' books before showing up to debate Marxism with an actual Marx scholar (among other. is dead and he never amended his manifesto that I know of. He sees the rejections of some systemic failures of capitalism onto external It is todays capitalism that equalizers us too much and causes the loss of many talents. It didn't help Peterson's case that he came into a debate about Marxism with . Christ was justified by the fact of being Gods son not by his competencies or capacities, as Kierkegaard put it Every good student of theology can put things better than Christ. Remember Pauls words from Galatians There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer male and female in Christ. We will probably slide towards apocalypse, he said. So, here I think I know its provocative to call this a plea for communism, I do it a little bit to provoke things but what is needed is nonetheless in all these fears I claim ecology, digital control, unity of the world a capitalist market which does great things, I admit it, has to be somehow limited, regulated and so on. Kierkegaard, mine and everybodys favourite theologist, wrote If a child says he will obey his father because his father is a competent and good guy, this is an affront to fathers authority.